Two in situ permeable flow sensors, recently developed at Sandia National Laboratories, were field tested at the Brazos River Hydrologic Field Site near College Station, Texas. The flow sensors use a thermal perturbation technique to quantify the magnitude and direction of ground water flow in three dimensions. Two aquifer pumping tests lasting eight and 13 days were used to field test the flow sensors. Components of ground water flow as determined from piezometer gradient measurements were compared with ground water flow components derived from the 3-D flow sensors. The changes in velocity magnitude and direction of ground water flow induced by the pump were evaluated using flow sensor data and piezometric analyses. Flow sensor performance closely matched piezometric analysis results. Ground water flow direction (azimuth), as measured by the flow sensors and derived in the piezometric analysis, predicted the position of the pumping well accurately. Ground water flow velocities measured by the flow sensors compared well to velocities derived in the piezometric analysis. A significant delay in flow sensor response to relatively rapid changes in ground water flow was observed. Preliminary tests indicate that the in situ permeable flow sensor provides accurate and timely information on the velocity magnitude and direction of ground water flow.
ABSTRACT
A test of the In Situ Permeable Flow Sensor was conducted in which ground-water flow velocity measurements made by the flow sensors were directly compared to velocity estimates obtained using standard hydrologic techniques. Two flow sensors were deployed in a confined aquifer in close proximity to a well which was screened over the entire vertical extent of the aquifer. When the well was pumped at four different pumping rates, the horizontal component of the flow velocity measured by the flow sensors was directed toward the pumping well, within the uncertainty in the measurements, and the magnitude of the horizontal component of the velocity increased linearly with pumping rate, as predicted by theoretical considerations. The measured magnitudes differed from predicted values, calculated with the assumption that the hydraulic properties of the aquifer were homogeneous and isotropic, by less than a factor of two. Vertical components of ground-water flow observed with the flow sensors are qualitatively consistent with the vertical distribution of hydraulic conductivity estimated from grain-size analysis but are significantly larger in magnitude than predicted. This is likely due to the creation of a vertical conduit of increased hydraulic conductivity during emplacement of the probes. The results suggest that while the flow sensors measured the local ground-water flow velocity vector during the test quite accurately, care must be exercised to disturb the formation as little as possible during emplacement. The technology has many potential uses, particularly in the area of environmental site characterization and remediation process monitoring.
Copyright ©2000 HydroTechnics, All Rights Reserved on HT Original Materials
Send Hard Mail to: PO Box 92828, Albuquerque, NM 87199-92828, USA.
Send E-Mail to: webmaster@hydrotechnics.com; for information: info@hydrotechnics.com, tel. 505.797.2421